70 results for Unclassified, UC Research Repository

  • It makes you proud...

    Mason, E.G. (2006)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Editorial, New Zealand Journal of Forestry.

    View record details
  • Notes for RNZ slot from Ursula Cheer (Associate Professor) Canterbury University, 12 October 2011

    Cheer, U. (2011)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Ursula Cheer, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Canterbury, discusses the recent Rio Ferdinand decision, a privacy case from the High Court in the UK.

    View record details
  • Notes for RNZ slot from Ursula Cheer (Associate Professor) Canterbury University, 7 September 2011

    Cheer, U. (2011)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Discusses how UK newspapers the Sun and Daily Mirror were fined for contempt of court for articles published about a man arrested on suspicion of murdering Joanna Yeates.

    View record details
  • Notes for RNZ slot from Ursula Cheer (Associate Professor) Canterbury University, 29 February 2011

    Cheer, U. (2011)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    The recent Court of Appeal judgment in the Clayton Weatherston appeal, which raised issues of when a conviction can be overturned because of statements made in the media during trial.

    View record details
  • A note on James K. Baxter’s late poem ‘A Pair of Sandals’

    Millar, P.; Sharp, I. (2001)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    In his introduction the editor writes: 'I have also included “A Pair of Sandals” by James K. Baxter. This is a bit cheeky, since “A Pair of Sandals” clearly wasn’t written in 2001. Baxter died in 1972. But the poem was published for the first time in a 2001 selection of Baxter’s work edited by Paul Millar. I wanted to salute the excellent work Millar has done in retrieving Baxter’s more fugitive poems and making them accessible to contemporary readers.'

    View record details
  • Takitaki mai : a guide to motivational interviewing for Māori.

    Britt, Eileen F.; Gregory, Daryl; Tohiariki, Tohi; Huriwai, Terry (2014)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    View record details
  • Genetic research, population health and Maori

    Ahuriri-Driscoll, A.; Hudson, M.; Macartney-Coxson, D. (2009)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Early genetic research focused on identifying single genes responsible for specific familial disorders. However, radical technological advancements such as high throughput testing and genome-wide scanning techniques have made it possible to examine complex conditions influenced by multiple genes and environmental factors to determine population susceptibility. Genetic epidemiology studies the distribution of genetic traits and variation within families and populations, risk factors associated with the frequency of genetic traits, and the role of genetic factors in disease aetiology (Khoury, Beaty & Cohen, 19931). This enables the impact of a specific genetic variation on disease risk in an individual or in a population to be estimated (Kaprio, 20002). As the contribution of a single gene variant to disease can be relatively small, it is important to understand not only the contribution of other genetic factors but how these interact with environmental factors to modulate disease risk.

    View record details
  • Reducing beam hardening effects and metal artefacts in spectral CT using Medipix3RX

    Rajendran, K; Walsh, M. F.; de Ruiter, N. J. A.; Chernoglazov, A. I.; Panta, R. K.; Butler, P. H.; Bell, S. T.; Woodfield, T. B. F.; Tredinnick, J.; Healy, J. L.; Bateman, C. J.; Aamir, R.; Doesburg, R. M. N.; Renaud, P. F.; Gieseg, S. P.; Smithies, D. J.; Mohr, J. L.; Mandalika, V. B. H.; Opie, A. M. T.; Cook, N. J.; Ronaldson, J. P.; Nik, S. J.; Atharifard, A.; Clyne, M.; Bones, P. J.; Bartneck, C.; Grasset, R.; Schleich, N.; Billinghurst, M.; Butler, A. P. H.; Anderson, N. G. (2014-02-05)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    DICOM Raw Data, with explanatory text files.

    View record details
  • Book Review-- Environmental Planning in New Zealand

    Milke, M.W. (1993)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    View record details
  • A Defamation Case in the UK Involving the Qualified Privilege Defence and Why That's Significant for New Zealand

    Cheer, U. (2012)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    I will talk about a significant decision from the UK Supreme Court involving the very important developing qualified privilege defence – the Flood case. (We should have a decision in the Chris Cairns case by then too, so I will mention that briefly as well). The Flood case is important for NZ because it indicates how qualified privilege might develop as a defence over here. This decision was a unanimous one which dealt with what we call a preliminary question as to whether Times Newspapers could rely on a defence of qualified privilege in relation to an article it had published with the headline ‘Detective accused of taking bribes from Russian exiles’. The article contained allegations about a Mr Flood, who was a Detective Sergeant in the Extradition Unit of the Metropolitan Police. In the article, DS Flood was identified as possibly being a police officer at the centre of allegations about bribe taking in return for information from the Extradition Unit.

    View record details
  • King v Grundon: The need for real and substantial harm in defamation

    Cheer, U. (2012)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    I want to talk today about a recent decision of the UK High Court called King v Grundon. This was a defamation decision given extempore, which means an oral judgment given by the judge at the time – live, so to speak, or ‘off the cuff’. Such judgments are in the nature of doing immediate justice, but are persuasive only because of their ‘less thought out’ character. This makes the case a bit obscure, but it has an interesting New Zealand connection and is useful as an example of where the law is going and where it might go here.

    View record details
  • Censorship and 'Fifty Shades of Grey'

    Cheer, U. (2012)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    I want to talk about censorship of literature today, because the censor’s office just has classified Fifty Shades of Grey, by EL James. This is the book that started life as a piece of fan fiction based on that other classic series of books, the Twilight Saga by Stephanie Meyer. Fifty Shades of Grey, which none of the publishing houses wanted to touch until it took off virally online and became known as ‘mommy porn’. Fifty Shades of Grey is the acceptable book about BDSM (bondage and discipline, dominance and submission and sadism and masochism) sexual practices. It has been suggested the book is so popular because although it is about atypical sexual practices, it is able to be hidden on the kindle, no need to let anyone know you are reading it or the two sequels Fifty Shades Books like these create a bit of a problem for the censorship system. Classics like Lady Chatterley’s Lover, Lolita, De Sade’s Justin, have been around for years, there are lots of them about, and they are accepted to be classics. Fifty Shades is what could be described as an instant classic. The series has sold 350,000 copies here, and it’s been voted Number 5 in Whitcoulls’ top 100 list for 2012-2013. It has sold 40 million copies around the world. Yet on the face of it, the book looks objectionable in terms of our censorship legislation.

    View record details
  • The Man of Numbers: Fibonacci's Arithmetic Revolution : Book Review

    Hannah, J. (2012)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    View record details
  • How the law attempts to deal with hoaxes and pranks in the media that lead to harm

    Cheer, U. (2012)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Today I can’t avoid talking about how the law attempts to deal with hoaxes and pranks in the media that lead to harm, following the shocking outcome of the prank by Mel Greig and Michael Christian, hosts of 2Day FM Radio station in Sydney.

    View record details
  • Media law - disaster reporting

    Cheer, U. (2013)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Today I want to discuss the ongoing issue of how the internet is affecting areas of media law – in this case, defamation law. Many questions have been raised about the issue of publication on the internet and whether it should be treated any differently than publication in any other media, such as hard copy newspapers, broadcasting, on bill boards and the like.

    View record details
  • The Law Around Leaking and Breach of Confidence

    Cheer, U. (2013)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    As we know, it’s been a month of leaking, blogging and breaching court orders. I thought it would be a good idea to try and answer some general questions around the relevant laws, some of which have got mangled a bit in the reporting. What is a leak in terms of the law? Usually a leak involves a person who works for the government, a private organisation or for another individual publishing information that belongs to their employer and which they only know because of their employment relationship, to someone else who is not entitled to have it. This sort of activity is covered by the law called breach of confidence. This is not a criminal offence, but rather is a civil (or private) claim which one party brings against another. Third parties who receive such information and pass it on even though they know it is confidential, or even if they simply should know it is confidential, may also be breaching confidence. This area of the law is one that often impacts on media, which commonly receives information in unmarked envelopes, anonymous phone calls and so on.

    View record details
  • Juries and the use of social media during trials

    Cheer, U. (2013)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Media reported recently that there may be an attempt to stop the Jesse Ryder assault case because of publication of material that may damage the accused’s right to fair trial. One of the concerns in cases like this is that information will stay on the internet and juries might get access to it later. This really raises the issue of how to apply the sub judice laws to the internet. So today I thought I would talk about a recent study in Australia that has looked at juries and social media. This was a report carried out for the Victorian Department of Justice and published this year. The researchers there looked at what other studies world-wide have shown about what jurors do with social media, and also at what other Commonwealth countries do to address possible prejudice that might arise. This report is only about social media use, not internet use generally, although it must be said that many of the problems identified apply to the internet but perhaps not in such extreme forms.

    View record details
  • Tool, trophies in interactive learning

    Brogt, E. (2010)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    View record details
  • Disaster waste management research needs

    Milke, M. (2011)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    View record details
  • Singh Case and the Campaign to Reform UK Defamation Law

    Cheer, U. (2010)

    Unclassified
    University of Canterbury Library

    Recently, the Simon Singh defamation case became a cause celebre in the UK for a push for big changes in defamation law, which might have relevance to our law. However, some aspects of the campaign for change have been misinformed and misdirected. In a number of recent cases in the United Kingdom, professional bodies or companies have sued individuals who have criticised the support given by such bodies for the practices of their members or application of scientific methods. Simon Singh, a science writer, was sued by the British Chiropractic Association for questioning the evidence for its medical claims, and Peter Wilmshurst, a cardiologist, is being sued over his criticisms of an American company’s heart implant trial. A movement has grown up around these cases where concern has arisen about the chilling effects of the law on scientific criticism.

    View record details