The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals – A commentary
Author: Perezgonzalez, JD
Publisher: Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kvxc4
Type: Scholarly text
Link to this item using this URL: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kvxc4
‘The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals’ (Morey et al., 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8) delved into a much needed technical and philosophical dissertation regarding the differences between typical (mis)interpretations of frequentist confidence intervals and the typical correct interpretation of Bayesian credible intervals. My contribution here partly strengthens the authors’ argument, partly closes some gaps they left open, and concludes with a note of attention to the possibility that there may be distinctions without real practical differences in the ultimate use of estimation by intervals, namely when assuming a common ground of uninformative priors and intervals as ranges of values instead of as posterior distributions per se.
Subjects: Statistical inference, Credible interval, Confidence interval